Um blogue pró-Liberdade, anti-Nova Ordem Mundial

(Têm também aqui um bom texto de introdução a este assunto, escrito pela boa jornalista mencionada.)

A fazer lembrar um outro "engano" sobre esta mesma temática - e também a provar, uma vez mais, o quão mentem os média ocidentais sobre o conflito no leste da Ucrânia...
Eis que foi ontem desmentido (uma vez mais) por um órgão de comunicação russo, o que este último descreve (de modo eufemista) apenas como uma "citação errada", por parte dos média ocidentais, do que estava num relatório inicial da polícia italiana.

Hand grenades, rifle, crossbow & machete found in new neo-Nazi cell bust in Italy

(Como se, de tão ignorantes que são os jornalistas, não soubessem estes bem - e também toda a gente que sabe o mínimo sobre este conflito - de que lado é que têm lutado os fascistas...)
Têm <aqui> o exemplo da Agência Lusa a mentir sobre o sucedido.
E, têm também <aqui> uma pequena lista de sucedidos, sobre as diferentes versões do relatório policial em causa - que denuncia a cumplicidade do próprio governo italiano, em querer claramente encobrir de que lado é que lutavam estes voluntários fascistas.

Dois comentários que fiz à notícia de que Apple se juntou recentemente à campanha de tentativa de desacreditação da informação não emitida pelos grandes interesses económicos.
(Sendo que, se consultarem os outros comentários que deixei a tal notícia - de resposta a comentários de outras pessoas - poderão ver como me defendi eu do que outros diziam.)
A primeira citação é de um caso para o qual aqui já chamei a atenção. E, a segunda citação é de uma situação específica no campo científico (que, obviamente, se pode estender ao restantes ramos deste campo do conhecimento) que eu citava em correspondência privada, quando avisava os outros da propaganda mentirosa sobre vacinas.

Certamente, uma iniciativa de treta...

Em que, como fontes “credíveis” que sirvam para averiguar a veracidade dos factos, serão usados os média de massas (ou serviços de “verificação de factos”, controlados pelos mesmos grandes interesses económicos) – esses sim, os maiores mentirosos que existem:

“...taught to lie, to betray and not to tell the truth to the public.”
--- Dr. Udo Ulfkotte, ex-editor do Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (a descrever como a classe jornalística ocidental *mente* e escreve o que o poder estabelecido lhe diz para escrever – admissão esta, feita quando sabia ele que já lhe restavam poucos meses de vida)

 

*

 

Sobre as questões mais científicas, relativamente às quais só quem tiver conhecimentos específicos suficientes é que poderá estar em posição de avaliar a credibilidade ou não do que é reportado... Podemos confiar nas mais conhecidas publicações dos respectivos ramos?

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”
--- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcia_Angell

Jornal Público chama "assassínios em massa" a execuções de terroristas do Estado Islâmico.

As prisões da Síria estão a ser esvaziadas por assassínios em massa

Centenas de milhares de mortos, o país destruído e pessoas a passar fome em consequência de tudo isto... E querem que o dinheiro dos impostos das pessoas vá para alimentar os *terroristas* responsáveis por isto e por algumas das maiores barbáries dos tempos modernos?
Isto é o cúmulo da estupidez, na constante tentativa de distorcer os factos, para convencer os leitores de que é o regime de Assad o grande vilão.
Mas quem é que ainda lê um jornal tão revoltante, estúpido e nojento como este?!

"No Attacks, No Victims": Syria Chemical Attack Video Participants Speak At OPCW Briefing

by Tyler Durden [Zero Hedge]
Fri, 04/27/2018 - 22:23

Russian officials brought fifteen people to The Hague from the city of Douma, Syria, said to have been present during the alleged April 7 chemical attack - including 11-year-old Hassan Diab, who was seen in a widely-distributed video taken by the controversian NGO organization known as the "White Helmets," who filmed themselves giving Diab "emergency treatment" after the alleged incident.

“We were at the basement and we heard people shouting that we needed to go to a hospital. We went through a tunnel. At the hospital they started pouring cold water on me,” said Diab, who was featured in the video which Russia's ambassador to the Netherlands says was staged.

The boy and his family have spoken to various media outlets, who say there was no attack.



Others present during the filming of Diab's hospital "cleanup" by the White Helmets include hospital administrator Ahmad Kashoi, who runs the emergency ward.

 

“There were people unknown to us who were filming the emergency care, they were filming the chaos taking place inside, and were filming people being doused with water. The instruments they used to douse them with water were originally used to clean the floors actually,” Ahmad Kashoi, an administrator of the emergency ward, recalled. “That happened for about an hour, we provided help to them and sent them home. No one has died. No one suffered from chemical exposure.” -RT

 

Also speaking at The Hague was Halil al-Jaish, an emergency worker who treated people at the Douma hospital the day of the attack - who said that while some patients did come in for respiratory problems, they were attributed to heavy dust, present in the air after recent airstrikes, but that nobody showed signs of chemical warfare poisoning.

 

The hospital received people who suffered from smoke and dust asphyxiation on the day of the alleged attack, Muwaffak Nasrim, a paramedic who was working in emergency care, said. The panic seen in footage provided by the White Helmets was caused mainly by people shouting about the alleged use of chemical weapons, Nasrim, who witnessed the chaotic scenes, added. No patients, however, displayed symptoms of chemical weapons exposure, he said. -RT

 

Emergency paramedic Ahmad Saur who is with the Syrian Red Crescent, said that his hospital ward did not receive any patients exposed to chemical weapons the day of the alleged incident, and that all the patients either needed general medical care or help with injuries.



That said, none of these people's testimony will make it into the "official record" as it currently stands. Russia's permanent representative to the OPCW, Aleksandr Shulgin, said that the OPCW has already interviewed six alleged Douma witnesses brought to The Hague , and they won't interview any more.

 

“The others were ready too, but the experts are sticking to their own guidelines. They’ve picked six people, talked to them, and said they were 'completely satisfied' with their account and did not have any further questions" -Aleksandr Shulgin

 

Shulgin also said that "certain Western countries" accusing Russia and Syria of trying to "hide" witnesses to the attack is not true.

Meanwhile, the West - unhappy with this unexpected diversion to its narrative - has called the Russian press conference a "stunt" - with Britain and France both denouncing it as an "obscene masquerade."

“This obscene masquerade does not come as a surprise from the Syrian government, which has massacred and gassed its own people for the last seven years,” said France’s ambassador to the Netherlands, Philippe Lalliot.

"The OPCW is not a theatre," Britain's envoy to the agency, Peter Wilson, said in a statement. "Russia's decision to misuse it is yet another Russian attempt to undermine the OPCW's work, and in particular the work of its fact-finding mission investigating chemical weapons use in Syria."

In other words, the West is happy to bomb a sovereign nation based on nothing more than non-public "evidence" suspected to have been staged and provided by the White Helmets, but when actual residents of Douma show up to tell their side of it, they are condemned as an "obscene masquerade" and denied an opportunity to submit their testimony on the record. Sounds about right for the military industrial complex which if nothing else scored a few extra billion in procurement contracts thanks to the latest farcical attack on Syria.

Com as imprensas britânica, alemã e até mesmo portuguesa a serem forçadas a admitir isto (com a portuguesa - por ser dirigida a um público menos inteligente - a tentar distorcer os factos, ao falar apenas numa "alegada" encenação) já o pretexto para mais um muito estúpido ataque, por parte de Donald Trump, à Síria começou a cair por terra... E, cabe então agora à inteligência de cada um julgar os factos ocorridos por si próprio/a.
Mas, já que é de inteligência (ou falta dela) da parte de quem vê as notícias televisivas de que falamos, aproveito então para apelar a esta e também ao sentido crítico de quem lê este blogue, para analisar outras duas "provas" que a imprensa controlada nos apresentou para tentar convencer as pessoas de que um ataque químico realmente ocorreu.
Primeiro que tudo, reparem na linguagem corporal do seguinte entrevistado, que descreve a suposta morte da sua família... ("Oh, que chato. A minha família morreu toda... Olha, acontece.")



E, depois disso, espreitem <esta> análise de uma notícia emitida pela CNN, onde uma repórter decide cheirar uma mochila supostamente contaminada com o gás venenoso usado, para averiguar se tal mochila está contaminada ou não...
(Preciso eu de explicar sequer o que estaria imensamente errado na decisão de alguém fazer uma coisa destas, quando está a lidar com um gás venenoso?!)

[E, se tivesse ocorrido um destes horríveis incidentes - que, sabem Bashar al-Assad e toda a gente bem informada, não são mais do que a desculpa perfeita para que o Ocidente possa intervir a favor da sua al-Qaeda - teriam, obviamente, sido os próprios rebeldes os autores do mesmo... É a mesma história do que se passou há 5 anos - e não só. Reparem bem na altura em que isto acontece: uns meros dias depois de Trump ter declarado que queria retirar as tropas estadunidenses da Síria...]

"There Wasn't A Single Corpse": Russia Claims 'White Helmets' Staged Syria Chemical Attack

by Tyler Durden [Zero Hedge]
Thu, 04/12/2018 - 04:44

Russia claims that the reported chemical attack in Syria last Sunday was staged by the "white helmets," a US-funded NGO lauded by mainstream media for their humanitarian work, while long-suspected of performing less-than humanitarian deeds behind the curtain.

Speaking with EuroNews, Russia's ambassador to the EU, Vladimir Chizov, said "Russian military specialists have visited this region, walked on those streets, entered those houses, talked to local doctors and visited the only functioning hospital in Douma, including its basement where reportedly the mountains of corpses pile up. There was not a single corpse and even not a single person who came in for treatment after the attack."

"But we've seen them on the video!" responds EuroNews correspondent Andrei Beketov.

"There was no chemical attack in Douma, pure and simple," responds Chizov. "We've seen another staged event. There are personnel, specifically trained - and you can guess by whom - amongst the so-called White Helmets, who were already caught in the act with staged videos."



Russia said it sent experts in radiological, chemical and biological warfare - along with medics, in order to inspect the Eastern Ghouta city of Douma where the attack is said to have taken place.

Russia's Defense Ministry said in a statement that the experts "found no traces of the use of chemical agents," following a search of the sites, adding "All these facts show... that no chemical weapons were used in the town of Douma, as it was claimed by the White Helmets."

“All the accusations brought by the White Helmets, as well as their photos... allegedly showing the victims of the chemical attack, are nothing more than a yet another piece of fake news and an attempt to disrupt the ceasefire,” said the Russian Reconciliation Center.

In a statement to the UN Security Council on April 9, Russia's UN Ambassador, Vassily Nebenzia outlined Russia's position on the timeline of the attack in Douma, as well as the Western response after the White Helmets reported that chemical agents were used:

On April 6, the new head of Jaysh al-Islam, following instructions of sponsors, derailed the evacuation of a party of fighters from Douma and resumed the rocket and mortar fire against residential areas in Damascus. The firing targeted [indistinct name of four areas]. According to official information, eight people died. 37 civilians were wounded. Unfortunately, we failed to see statements from Western capitals condemning the shelling of a historical district of Damascus. The following day, April 7, fighters accused the Syrian authorities of dropping barrel bombs with toxic substances. At the same time, diversions were being mixed up. It was either called sarin, chlorine, or a mix of toxic gases. Based on a well-known scheme, these rumors were immediately taken out by those who are financed by western capitalists; I am referring to NGOs and the White Helmets who are mendaciously acting under the cloak of health professionals. And these reports were also taken up and transferred to media outlets.

It behooves us once again to state that many of these dubious structures have a clear list of the email addresses of representatives of Security Council members, which shows that some of our colleagues, with a reckless approach towards their status, are leaking sensitive information to their protégés. Incidentally, all should recall the way that accidentally, the White Helmets put on the internet a video which showed preparations for staging a so-called victim of an alleged attack perpetrated by the Syrian army.

Indeed, over the last several years, reports out of Syria have been criticized as being primarily of anti-Assad origin and unverified.

In a speech at the UN, pro-Assad Canadian journalist and RT contributor Eva Bartlett gave her account of what's going on with reports out of Syria - calling western sources "compromised" and "not credible."



Meanwhile, UK Prime Minister Theresa May told President Trump on Tuesday that Britain would require more evidence in last weekend's suspected chemical attack before committing to a military strike against Syria, reports The Times.

The prime minister rejected a swift retaliation as inspectors from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) prepared to visit the Damascus suburb where at least 40 people were reported to have been killed by chlorine gas on Saturday. -The Times

May chaired a meeting of the national security council in London this week, where she spoke with Presidents Trump and Macron for the first time since the Douma chemical attack. It is reported that Trump, who's had a remarkable change of heart on U.S. involvement in Syria since the election, did not ask the UK to join military strikes.

A No 10 read-out of her call with the US president stated that they agreed the international community “needed to respond” but stopped short of blaming the Syrian regime. “They agreed that reports of a chemical weapons attack in Syria were utterly reprehensible and if confirmed, represented further evidence of the Assad regime’s appalling cruelty against its own people and total disregard for its legal obligations not to use these weapons,” it said. -The Times

President Trump also appears to have backed off an imminent strike after promising Syria would "pay a big price," and that the U.S. response would be decided by Wednesday. Trump reportedly canceled travel plans after reports emerged that Russian and Iranian involvement in Syria would complicate matters in the region.

Meanwhile, Secretary of Defense James Mattis has said that the U.S. is still assessing intelligence on the alleged chemical attack, saying in a statement "we're still working on this." In the same breath, Mattis said the United States is "ready" to provide military options for Syria.

(Está disponível uma transcrição desta muito importante declaração, há poucos dias feita na ONU pelo Embaixador russo, Vassily Nebenzia, <aqui>.)

Um comentário que deixei, na página de notícias "ZAP" do portal aeiou.pt, à notícia "Brevemente, esta notícia será escrita por um robô", que fala sobre um futuro próximo em que os jornalistas que temos irão ser substituídos por Inteligência Artificial.
Comentário esse que, não surpreendentemente, não foi publicado. Sendo que, de qualquer modo, já tinha eu decidido não deixar mais quaisquer críticas ou avisos nessa página, depois de terem lá repetidamente censurado comentários meus - por razões aparentemente ridículas, que nada tiveram a ver com qualquer indecência da minha parte.*

Fernando Negro (#comment-275134)

Se interpretarmos "artificial" como sinónimo de "falsa", há já muito que tal inteligência se instalou no jornalismo convencional.

Os meios de comunicação de massas pouco mais são, hoje em dia, do que grandes gaiolas mentais cheias de papagaios, que nunca saem das mesmas para investigar o que quer que seja e que se limitam a repetir o que lhes é dito pelos governos e grandes interesses económicos - que, de acordo com a "inteligência" de tais jornalistas convencionais, supostamente nunca mentem.

Desde repetir alegações da parte de governos, que anteriormente foram apanhados a mentir, como factos inquestionáveis, a não apontar (ou reparar sequer em) as inconsistências dos comunicados oficiais, a repetidamente apresentar certas afirmações duvidosas como verdades (como que o Planeta está mais quente do que nunca) sem nunca apresentar uma única prova que seja do que é afirmado (pois, os gráficos verdadeiros provariam o contrário), há já muito tempo que o jornalismo convencional é uma contínua emissão de propaganda com origem e destino em pessoas cuja inteligência se pode considerar equiparada à "artificial".

Pois, que venham os robôs, então. Os supostos humanos que lá estão a fazer este muito triste papel pouco diferentes são dos seus futuros substitutos.

* (Sendo de notar que, um desses meus comentários consistia numa crítica à livre circulação de pessoas no dito "Espaço Schengen", a propósito da notícia de que dois suspeitos de pertencerem ao Estado Islâmico tinham fugido da polícia portuguesa, após terem conseguido atravessar toda a Europa, desde a Finlândia, sem terem sido detidos em alguma fronteira - e que depois pude eu constatar que tinha sido censurado, por violar uma regra desta página na Internet, que se diz intolerante com a dita "xenofobia", confirmando o que já dizia eu há uma década, de que iria chegar o dia em que quem se assuma contra esta União Europeia é considerado "xenófobo".)

A propósito da notícia (e reacções à mesma) - [1] [2] - de que o maior órgão de propaganda do Império Britânico, a BBC, iniciou a sua maior expansão de sempre desde a década de 1940, deixo aqui uma colectânea de vídeos do que fazem alguns cidadãos britânicos que não querem ser lavados ao cérebro pelo mesmo - e que, por isso, se recusam a pagar o equivalente ao nosso imposto de Contribuição Audiovisual (que, no Reino Unido, só paga quem vir este lixo de canais televisivos).

[Quem pense que o perigo de uma Terceira Guerra Mundial foi eliminado com a não eleição de Hillary Clinton, desengane-se... Pois, com alguém que não prima pela sanidade mental e com notórios complexos de grandeza na presidência dos EUA, que não pensa duas vezes antes de "premir o gatilho", é este um perigo que irá estar sempre presente.]

Peligro y estúpido ataque a Siria: los británicos y neoconservadores engañaron a Trump

[LaRouche PAC] 7 de abril de 2017 — El ataque con misiles crucero ordenado por el Presidente Trump contra la base aérea siria fue un acto “estúpido”, con base en mentiras descaradas que le vendieron a Trump los británicos y los neoconservadores que han penetrado su gobierno, y que no quieren ver que surja una alianza entre Estados Unidos, Rusia y China. Esta fue la evaluación de Lyndon LaRouche y de Helga Zepp LaRouche, quienes destacaron que la escandalosa y peligrosa violación del derecho internacional que le endosar a Trump, es parte también de la “revolución de color” que está ya a todo vapor, el golpe de Estado de Wall Street diseñado para tumbar su gobierno.

“Los británicos pusieron en movimiento esto contra toda la especie humana”, señaló Lyndon LaRouche específicamente.

Los ataques comenzaron a las 00:45 GMT del 7 de abril, en el momento en que se iniciaba el banquete oficial del Presidente Trump al mandatario visitante de China, Presidente Xi Jinping, luego de la primera fase de su reunión en la residencia de Mar-a-Lago, Florida. Después de la cena, Trump se retiró para hacer la declaración oficial del ataque contra Siria.

La acción que se calificó oficialmente como un ataque de “solo una vez”, se realizó desde los buques de la armada de Estados Unidos estacionados en el Mediterráneo, que lanzaron 59 cohetes crucero Tomahawk contra la Base Aérea de al-Shairat en Homs, Siria. El Departamento de Estado emitió una declaración en la que dice que se le dio aviso previo a Rusia en el contexto del acuerdo existente para evitar conflictos. Siria no fue informada directamente, pero se podría esperar que Rusia informó a Siria. El gobierno sirio informó que 6 soldados sirios fueron asesinados en el ataque.

En el anuncio de los ataques, el Presidente Trump estableció como un hecho supuestamente probado que “el dictador sirio Bashar al-Assad lanzó un horrible ataque con armas químicas contra civiles inocentes... No puede haber ninguna discusión sobre que Siria utilizó armas químicas prohibidas”. Estas son aseveraciones sin prueba que le pasaron a Trump como hechos, antes de que se realizara ninguna investigación competente por parte de la ONU o de ningún otro organismo. Diversas fuentes de inteligencia bien informadas le han dicho a EIR que la Fuerza Aérea Siria realizó realmente un ataque aéreo contra lo que ellos consideran un depósito de armas del Estado Islámico (EIIS), que resultó que tenía armas químicas pertenecientes a los terroristas, y que estos hechos son conocidos por las agencias de inteligencia de Estados Unidos, pero que no fueron reportadas verazmente al Presidente Trump.

En su breve anuncio Trump dijo también que “es del interés vital de la seguridad nacional de Estados Unidos prevenir y disuadir el empleo de armas químicas letales... Esta noche, llamo a todas las naciones civilizadas a unirse a nosotros en el objetivo de acabar la masacre y el baño de sangre en Siria”.

El Secretario de Estado, Rex Tillerson, alegó que Rusia no había cumplido en implementar el acuerdo de 2013 para destruir las armas químicas de Siria. “Es claro que Rusia ha fallado en cumplir con ese compromiso de 2013”, le dijo Tillerson a los periodistas en Florida. “Así que, o Rusia ha sido cómplice o Rusia ha sido incompetente en su capacidad de cumplir... Nosotros sentimos que el ataque fue proporcional”, agregó.

“Esto indica de manera clara que el Presidente está dispuesto a tomar acciones decisivas cuando sea necesario”, alegó Tillerson. “En ningún modo intentaría extrapolar que eso es un cambio en nuestra política o en nuestra postura con relación a nuestras actividades militares en Siria hoy. No ha habido ningún cambio en ese estatus”, agregó.

De acuerdo a un funcionario de la defensa de Estados Unidos, a quien cita la agencia Reuters, Trump preguntó primero el 5 de abril cuáles serían las posibles acciones militares, después de que las agencias de inteligencia le habían dado la línea de que las naves sirias estacionadas en la Base Aérea de el-Shairat habían lanzado gas sarín contra civiles.

No se ha presentado ninguna “prueba” pública. La única información pública se origina de los llamados “Cascos Blancos”, un grupo financiado por los británicos y con conocidos nexos con el Estado Islámico.

 

*

 

LPAC Statement on Syria bombing: Fraud Against the President; Fraud Against the Nation

April 7, 2017 — In reviewing the Syria bombing ordered by President Donald J. Trump yesterday, Lyndon and Helga LaRouche condemned it in the strongest terms possible. President Trump received a fraudulent briefing on the event itself – asserting that Bashar al-Assad was responsible for a chemical weapons attack on his own population – despite the fact that U.S. military forces on the ground in Syria knew that the chemicals came from an Al-Qaeda base, as stated by Russia and Syria. President Trump was lied to by individuals in his national security/intelligence chain of command. The sources utilized to claim Syrian culpability for the attack are exclusively British, the same people who are coordinating the international attack on Trump’s Presidency, in an effort to destroy any positive potential for relationships with Russia and China to rebuild the U.S. and world economy. This was a violation of international law. Trump was setup. “The British set this in motion against the entire human race,” Lyndon LaRouche emphasized.

LaRouche said the Trump must immediately seek out those responsible for the fraud and fire them. A United Nations investigation of the incident must occur immediately. Following both, a war crimes prosecution would be appropriate. The President should never listen to the British. It is not accidental that this setup occurred right when the President was meeting with China’s President Xi Jinping – a meeting which has the British and their Wall Street allies completely apoplectic – a meeting which could portend a new and peaceful paradigm for economic and scientific progress.

LaRouche PAC is coordinating a national mobilization against this fraud, telling the President to fire those responsible, and return to the sound American system premises of his Presidency, not the World War III policies of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. Nothing less than the continued viability of his presidency is at stake. We are also demanding that the United Nations immediately investigate.

According to numerous intelligence community sources who have commented or who have been interviewed by LaRouche PAC, active duty U.S. forces on the ground in Syria knew that this was not a Syrian government chemical attack. The Syrians hit an Al-Qaeda base which was storing chemical weapons used by the terrorists. U.S. forces on the ground reported that it was not a Syrian chemical weapons attack up the chain of command. The United States had been notified of the Syrian mission before it took place and knew about the Syrian targeting. Someone either deliberately lied to the President about this information or kept it from him.

The on the ground intelligence purporting to document a chemical weapons attack by the Syrian Air Force came from the White Helmets group, created by the British, financed by the British Defense Ministry, and totally penetrated by and supporting ISIS and Al Nusra terrorists. The other cited “proof” comes from the Syrian Human Rights Observatory which consists of a single individual, residing in London, who is notorious for widely disseminating inaccurate information.

The President needs to hear from those who voted for him and other patriots who are not interested in World War III or perpetual war in the Middle East. The swamp which needs draining is the Wall Street/London/Washington D.C. neo-conservative, liberal interventionist swamp which has squandered the nation’s wealth, and involved our youth in fraudulent wars destroying the morale of an entire generation. Mr. President, find, fire, and prosecute those responsible for this.

Call the White House comment line at 202-456-1111 Monday-Friday or call switchboard at 202-456-1414.
You can write a message to the White House at whitehouse.gov/contact
You can tweet the President at @realDonaldTrump.