Saltar para: Posts [1], Pesquisa e Arquivos [2]

Não houve qualquer ataque químico na Síria (x2)


Com as imprensas britânica, alemã e até mesmo portuguesa a serem forçadas a admitir isto (com a portuguesa - por ser dirigida a um público menos inteligente - a tentar distorcer os factos, ao falar apenas numa "alegada" encenação) já o pretexto para mais um muito estúpido ataque, por parte de Donald Trump, à Síria começou a cair por terra... E, cabe então agora à inteligência de cada um julgar os factos ocorridos por si próprio/a.
Mas, já que é de inteligência (ou falta dela) da parte de quem vê as notícias televisivas de que falamos, aproveito então para apelar a esta e também ao sentido crítico de quem lê este blogue, para analisar outras duas "provas" que a imprensa controlada nos apresentou para tentar convencer as pessoas de que um ataque químico realmente ocorreu.
Primeiro que tudo, reparem na linguagem corporal do seguinte entrevistado, que descreve a suposta morte da sua família... ("Oh, que chato. A minha família morreu toda... Olha, acontece.")

E, depois disso, espreitem <esta> análise de uma notícia emitida pela CNN, onde uma repórter decide cheirar uma mochila supostamente contaminada com o gás venenoso usado, para averiguar se tal mochila está contaminada ou não...
(Preciso eu de explicar sequer o que estaria imensamente errado na decisão de alguém fazer uma coisa destas, quando está a lidar com um gás venenoso?!)

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

colocado por Fernando Negro às 00:21

Não houve qualquer ataque químico na Síria


[E, se tivesse ocorrido um destes horríveis incidentes - que, sabem Bashar al-Assad e toda a gente bem informada, não são mais do que a desculpa perfeita para que o Ocidente possa intervir a favor da sua al-Qaeda - teriam, obviamente, sido os próprios rebeldes os autores do mesmo... É a mesma história do que se passou há 5 anos - e não só. Reparem bem na altura em que isto acontece: uns meros dias depois de Trump ter declarado que queria retirar as tropas estadunidenses da Síria...]


"There Wasn't A Single Corpse": Russia Claims 'White Helmets' Staged Syria Chemical Attack

by Tyler Durden [Zero Hedge]
Thu, 04/12/2018 - 04:44

Russia claims that the reported chemical attack in Syria last Sunday was staged by the "white helmets," a US-funded NGO lauded by mainstream media for their humanitarian work, while long-suspected of performing less-than humanitarian deeds behind the curtain.

Speaking with EuroNews, Russia's ambassador to the EU, Vladimir Chizov, said "Russian military specialists have visited this region, walked on those streets, entered those houses, talked to local doctors and visited the only functioning hospital in Douma, including its basement where reportedly the mountains of corpses pile up. There was not a single corpse and even not a single person who came in for treatment after the attack."

"But we've seen them on the video!" responds EuroNews correspondent Andrei Beketov.

"There was no chemical attack in Douma, pure and simple," responds Chizov. "We've seen another staged event. There are personnel, specifically trained - and you can guess by whom - amongst the so-called White Helmets, who were already caught in the act with staged videos."

Russia said it sent experts in radiological, chemical and biological warfare - along with medics, in order to inspect the Eastern Ghouta city of Douma where the attack is said to have taken place.

Russia's Defense Ministry said in a statement that the experts "found no traces of the use of chemical agents," following a search of the sites, adding "All these facts show... that no chemical weapons were used in the town of Douma, as it was claimed by the White Helmets."

All the accusations brought by the White Helmets, as well as their photos... allegedly showing the victims of the chemical attack, are nothing more than a yet another piece of fake news and an attempt to disrupt the ceasefire,” said the Russian Reconciliation Center.

In a statement to the UN Security Council on April 9, Russia's UN Ambassador, Vassily Nebenzia outlined Russia's position on the timeline of the attack in Douma, as well as the Western response after the White Helmets reported that chemical agents were used:

On April 6, the new head of Jaysh al-Islam, following instructions of sponsors, derailed the evacuation of a party of fighters from Douma and resumed the rocket and mortar fire against residential areas in Damascus. The firing targeted [indistinct name of four areas]. According to official information, eight people died. 37 civilians were wounded. Unfortunately, we failed to see statements from Western capitals condemning the shelling of a historical district of Damascus. The following day, April 7, fighters accused the Syrian authorities of dropping barrel bombs with toxic substances. At the same time, diversions were being mixed up. It was either called sarin, chlorine, or a mix of toxic gases. Based on a well-known scheme, these rumors were immediately taken out by those who are financed by western capitalists; I am referring to NGOs and the White Helmets who are mendaciously acting under the cloak of health professionals. And these reports were also taken up and transferred to media outlets.

It behooves us once again to state that many of these dubious structures have a clear list of the email addresses of representatives of Security Council members, which shows that some of our colleagues, with a reckless approach towards their status, are leaking sensitive information to their protégés. Incidentally, all should recall the way that accidentally, the White Helmets put on the internet a video which showed preparations for staging a so-called victim of an alleged attack perpetrated by the Syrian army.

Indeed, over the last several years, reports out of Syria have been criticized as being primarily of anti-Assad origin and unverified.

In a speech at the UN, pro-Assad Canadian journalist and RT contributor Eva Bartlett gave her account of what's going on with reports out of Syria - calling western sources "compromised" and "not credible."

Meanwhile, UK Prime Minister Theresa May told President Trump on Tuesday that Britain would require more evidence in last weekend's suspected chemical attack before committing to a military strike against Syria, reports The Times.

The prime minister rejected a swift retaliation as inspectors from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) prepared to visit the Damascus suburb where at least 40 people were reported to have been killed by chlorine gas on Saturday. -The Times

May chaired a meeting of the national security council in London this week, where she spoke with Presidents Trump and Macron for the first time since the Douma chemical attack. It is reported that Trump, who's had a remarkable change of heart on U.S. involvement in Syria since the election, did not ask the UK to join military strikes.

A No 10 read-out of her call with the US president stated that they agreed the international community “needed to respond” but stopped short of blaming the Syrian regime. “They agreed that reports of a chemical weapons attack in Syria were utterly reprehensible and if confirmed, represented further evidence of the Assad regime’s appalling cruelty against its own people and total disregard for its legal obligations not to use these weapons,” it said. -The Times

President Trump also appears to have backed off an imminent strike after promising Syria would "pay a big price," and that the U.S. response would be decided by Wednesday. Trump reportedly canceled travel plans after reports emerged that Russian and Iranian involvement in Syria would complicate matters in the region.

Meanwhile, Secretary of Defense James Mattis has said that the U.S. is still assessing intelligence on the alleged chemical attack, saying in a statement "we're still working on this." In the same breath, Mattis said the United States is "ready" to provide military options for Syria.




(Está disponível uma transcrição desta muito importante declaração, há poucos dias feita na ONU pelo Embaixador russo, Vassily Nebenzia, <aqui>.)

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

Isto é que é Patriotismo


Bravos irlandeses, que nunca deixaram de lutar pela independência do seu país, apesar de séculos de repressão e de terem até sido alvo de uma campanha genocida por parte do Império Britânico.

E, cujos alguns dos descendentes, mantendo-se fiéis ao espírito dos seus antepassados, continuam a lutar contra as novas formas de opressão imperialista.


David Rockefeller confronted at his dinner table by "The Sovereign Independent" at the Trilateral Commission

Sovereign Independent
May 10, 2010

At approximately 12:15 pm on 9th May, two representatives of the Irish newspaper, The Sovereign Independent entered The Four Seasons Hotel in Dublin, Ireland, where the latest meeting of the Trilateral Commission was taking place and confronted David Rockefeller at his dinner table.

We unassumingly entered the reception area of the hotel and proceeded through the lobby to the seating and dining area at the back of the premises where we sat down and ordered coffee. There was a table immediately behind us which was set up for lunch for 6 people.

We had a few copies of our newspaper with us and discussed posting a few at reception to Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller when to my utter surprise I noticed David Rockefeller’s bodyguard walking in my direction. Without acting suspicious I then observed the trademark walking stick behind the bodyguard and David Rockefeller was suddenly walking past us and took the seat at the table set for lunch directly behind us.

We immediately decided that we couldn’t miss this opportunity to confront the evil sitting in our midst and to our complete surprise were given the opportunity when the bodyguard appeared to leave the room.

With a few deep breaths we both rose and confronted David Rockefeller at his dinner table in front of his guests with the words. “Mr. Rockefeller, you will never get your New World Order. We are not your slaves; we are not your slaves.”

The room fell into complete silence as our words reverberated all the way through to the reception area with the stunned looks on Rockefeller’s guest’s faces evident in the footage. Rockefeller had a look of complete shock on his face as I leant over him and placed a copy of The Sovereign Independent right in front of him on his table taking care not to touch him in any way or to disturb anything on his table.

We calmly turned away as the bodyguard, clearly not knowing that we had caused the disturbance, ran past us to get to Rockefeller. We walked the approximately 40m to the front entrance, down the drive past the attending police officers and onto the street.

Unfortunately due to the risk of our phone being taken from us as we were filming the video is a bit shaky and Rockefeller can only be seen briefly at the end, almost in silohette, although, anyone who knows what he looks like should clearly recognise him. He is only in the last few frames of the video on the far left.

We’d been there the previous day with Jim Tucker, holding a peaceful protest, outside the gates with a number of other groups which had gone well. Hundreds of copies of the newspaper were handed to passersby who had wanted to know what was going on.

There had also been an attempt to have Henry Kissinger arrested under an arrest warrant issued by the Spanish authorities which was, as far as was known, still valid. This evidence was presented to the police officers on duty and recorded. This matter is currently ongoing with visits to the Spanish embassy in Dublin being made this morning, Monday 10th May.

Neil Foster & Dave Derby, The Sovereign Independent

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

Definitivamente, a RT já não é o que era...



[Duas cartas electrónicas que, há poucos dias, enviei a um amigo meu que vive em França, depois de me ter ele enviado uma hiperligação para uma discussão no fórum "reddit", sobre a publicidade que a RT faz no Metro de Londres.]


Assunto: Publicité de Russia Today dans le métro de Londres

Deverá ser um bom avanço. Mas, infelizmente, a RT já não é o que era...

De ser uma estação de televisão verdadeiramente incómoda ( passou a ser uma mais "moderada", que já evita os assuntos mais polémicos (

E, para além disto, já soube de dois casos em que se calaram por causa de ameaças vindas de governos. Sendo estes (1) o facto de não entrevistarem mais o Alex Jones (que foi quem iniciou a mim e muita gente nesta temática das "conspirações") devido a uma ameaça do governo estadunidense ( e (2) o terem-se recusado a emitir um episódio da série de documentários do Daniel Estulin, devido a uma ameaça da Presidente Kirchner, da Argentina ( +

Para além disto, a RT cometeu o que é, para mim, o maior pecado de todos, que podem cometer os média de massas ou a classe política - que foi (começar a) mentir sobre a questão das "alterações climáticas" ( depois de, no passado, ter andado a chamar a atenção para esta fraude (

O que o Daniel Estulin (que é russo) diz, é que a situação política na Rússia não é tão simples como parece. Pois, se o Putin notoriamente controla a política exterior deste país, a sua economia nacional está ainda nas mãos dos traidores/liberais que lá foram postos pelos americanos, a seguir à queda da União Soviética (sendo essa, até, a razão pela qual a economia da Rússia continua em tão mau estado, apesar do enorme potencial que o país tem). E, como tal, há ainda certos órgãos do Estado russo sob o controlo de traidores.

O Estulin (que ficou fulo com a censura de que foi alvo) diz que a RT é então um órgão que está sob o controlo dos liberais - e que terá sido por isso que ele foi censurado. Mas, eu não partilho desta opinião... Apenas, acho que a RT moderou (muito erradamente, na minha opinião) os seus critérios editoriais e está agora a seguir a linha do seu governo de alinhar também com a mentira do "aquecimento global" (

De qualquer modo, a partir do momento em que apanho eu uma grande entidade a mentir sobre um assunto importante, perco a confiança na mesma. E, como tal, deixo de poder acreditar em quase qualquer coisa que dela venha. E, juntando isto ao facto de ser esta estação de televisão agora pouco diferente das restantes... Acabei por perder muito de (ou quase todo) o interesse que tinha pela mesma...

Ainda assim, há momentos que nunca irei esquecer de ter visto nos seus canais, como os seguintes:




Assunto: Esclarecida a verdadeira natureza da RT

Até ler os seguintes tweets do Daniel Estulin, pensei que as críticas dele à RT fossem mais motivadas por rancor pessoal, por ter tal estação de televisão cancelado a série de documentários dele, que era exibida no canal em castelhano. Pois, pensei que fosse esta estação totalmente financiada pelo governo russo. Mas, parece que não é assim... E, como sempre, a melhor maneira de compreender a (verdadeira) natureza de uma fonte mediática é "seguir o dinheiro":

A resposta que ele acabou de me dar a algo de muito estranho em que eu já tinha reparado, aliás, confirma que há aqui mais (e pior) censura do que eu pensava:

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

A razão pela qual as próximas décadas vão ser mesmo muito más



Um comentário que deixei num sítio na Internet sobre as novidades no campo da informática e também sobre novas tecnologias, que veio no seguimento de uma colocação que foi feita sobre a energia de fusão - no final da qual o autor perguntava às pessoas se achavam que iríamos ter este tipo de energia já disponível daqui a pouco mais de uma década.
Quem quiser, pode também consultar os restantes comentários à colocação em causa, para mais explicações, que eu lá deixei, sobre o que se passa em torno de tudo isto.


Fernando Negro 4 de Julho de 2017 às 16:07

«Um pouco de pressão e uma competição saudável seria o necessário para ter a motivação suficiente para que este prazo se cumpra.»

Mentira. A fusão nuclear já podia até ser uma realidade, não fosse o constante subfinanciamento consciente de projectos governamentais no Ocidente – e o encerramento dos mesmos, quando estes têm sucesso (

A fusão nuclear está a ser propositadamente adiada pelas mesmas pessoas que andam a propagandear a mentira do “aquecimento global” antropogénico ( E, o objectivo de ambas as acções é reduzir a população mundial para números que sejam mais fáceis de controlar (

Se os países BRICS (que não fazem parte deste conluio) tiverem possibilidades de investir dinheiro suficiente no projecto ITER (, poderemos ter a fusão nuclear mais cedo. Caso contrário, só quando se acabar de destruir a sociedade que temos, para dar lugar à pretendida pelas elites ocidentais, é que irá aparecer a energia de fusão.

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

colocado por Fernando Negro às 12:11

Alegado bombista de Manchester é filho de um membro de grupo apoiado (apenas no passado?) pelos serviços secretos britânicos




(O grupo em causa, pertencente à al-Qaeda, é o cuja história é descrita <nesta> página da Wikipedia. E, no final desta colocação que estou a fazer, têm uma palestra do abaixo referido ex-espião do MI5, David Shayler, a contar o que sabia sobre este apoio.)


Blowback? Manchester bomber linked to terrorist group which UK allegedly backed

[RT] Published time: 25 May, 2017 12:24

Manchester suicide bomber Salman Abedi and his father, Ramadan, had long-standing links to a violent jihadist group which may have had British backing for the 2011 Libyan war and a 1996 attempt to kill then-Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

The controversy centers on the role of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which was both an anti-Gaddafi and Al-Qaeda subsidiary in the North African state.

Many of the fighters which formed the group in the mid-90s were veterans of the Afghan-Soviet war from the 1980s. They went on to fight the Gaddafi regime in Libya itself.

The war saw the overthrow of the Gaddafi regime and the eventual murder of the leader himself after he was captured by opposition fighters. Since NATO’s intervention, Libya has been in chaos.

It has descended into a protracted civil war, is a major contributor to the international refugee crisis, has its own branch of Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL), and two opposing governments.

The elder Abedi was reportedly one of the LIFG fighters who fled Gaddafi’s response to the rebels, settling in London and, later, in Manchester.

The area of Manchester in which Salman Abedi grew up was home to a number of other LIFG members, including former senior commanders including Abd al-Baset Azzouz, who left Manchester to go to Libya and run a 200-300-strong militant network for Osama Bin Laden’s successor, Ayman al-Zawahiri. Azzouz is reported to be an expert bomb-maker.

In 2002, former MI[5] agent and whistleblower David Shayler accused the British spy agency of colluding with the jihadist group in a failed 1996 effort to kill Gaddafi, an allegation the British government strenuously denies.

Allegations have also emerged that in 2011, the UK may have relaxed restrictions on LIFG fighters based in the UK and helped them return to Libya to fight Gaddafi.

The UK was at that time engaged in fighting Gaddafi as part of a US-led NATO coalition. Former fighters interviewed by the Middle East Eye said that the UK actively supported the return of anti-Gaddafi dissidents, including those with Al-Qaeda links, to the North African state.

One fighter who spoke to the Middle East Eye said he had been interviewed by an MI5 agent who asked if he was “willing to go into battle?”

“While I took time to find an answer he turned and told me the British government have no problem with people fighting against Gaddafi,” the fighter said.

Others reported that when the war in Libya began, they looked into how to get fake documents, because their passports had been removed as part of restrictive control orders placed on them by the UK government.

One said that within days, the authorities had returned their passports, after which they headed straight to Libya to take on Gaddafi.

At the time of the war, current UK Prime Minister Theresa May was Home Secretary, with oversight of MI5 operations. It is not clear if she was aware of the decision to relax restrictions of jihadists and return their travel documents.




Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

Para quem pense que a "sexualização das crianças" é uma paranoia



Quando falo de sexualizar as crianças e confundi-las quanto à sua sexualidade, ou orientação sexual, original, é disto que falo:


Number of children wanting to become opposite sex doubling each year in Sweden, say doctors

[RT] Published time: 16 Mar, 2017 11:17

The number of children feeling the anxiety of being trapped in the wrong body is doubling each year in Sweden, with children as young as six wanting to become the opposite sex, doctors have said, according to local media.

Last year, a Swedish gender investigation team saw some 197 children and young people keen to undergo analysis to determine their gender identity and become the opposite sex, Louise Frisen, child psychiatrist at the Astrid Lindgren Children’s Hospital in Stockholm, told Swedish daily Aftonbladet.

“There’s a 100 percent increase in numbers each year,” Frisen said.

“There [are] more and more young people, and more children coming at very young ages. The increase is identical on the adult side too,” she added.

The country has six clinics for people seeking gender investigation. The overall increase in the number of people who believe they were born in the wrong body indicates a "greater openness" in Swedish society, Cecilia Dhejne, chief of the gender identity investigation team at the Karolinska University Hospital, said.

Dhejne warned, however, that healthcare resources are already overstretched. “The problem in Sweden is that there is a long queue for people both for initiating an investigation into their gender identity and for the different stages of treatment across the country. It is worrying.”

She added that waiting lists can be critical for young people. At a clinic in Lund, southern Sweden, people may have to wait for up to a year just to come and begin an investigation. “Having to go and wait aggravates the mental health of transgender people," Dhejne noted.

"You put the lives of young people on standby, and it's not good," she added.

Meanwhile, the country's public health minister, Gabriel Wikstrom, has promised more support for gender identity clinics.

“Deficiencies in care for transgender people at every stage of treatment are totally unacceptable,” he told Aftonbladet, adding that the waiting time is unnecessary.

The official pointed out that the government had set up a commission to keep close tabs on waiting times and gaps in care, noting that authorities “had no clue that there is a huge problem.”

Last year Gothenburg resident Charlie Lyrehed told the Local that he had been verbally abused and physically assaulted after two men saw his tattoo of a transgender symbol as he was heading home from the Stockholm Pride festival.

“Anyone who breaks what is seen as some kind of norm is a potential victim,” Lyrehed said.

“It points to a tendency of coldness, hatred, incomprehension and prejudice sweeping through our country right now.”

The American College of Pediatricians has meanwhile urged healthcare professionals and legislators to scrap all policies that condition children to "accept as normal" a life of "chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex."

"Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful is child abuse," the group said in an open letter.

"Endorsing gender discordance as normal via public education and legal policies will confuse children and parents, leading more children to present to 'gender clinics' where they will be given puberty-blocking drugs,” the statement said. That in return might result in “unnecessary surgical mutilation of their healthy body parts as young adults.”


Com a imprensa controlada a elogiar (e a incentivar) este tipo de comportamentos - .pt/atualidade/artigos/gavin-o-rapaz-transgenero-que-luta-pelo-direito-de-usar-a-casa-de-banho-dos-homens - do que é que estão à espera?

(Se fosse este um fenómeno natural, a sua incidência não se alteraria ao longo do tempo...)

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

colocado por Fernando Negro às 01:04