Saltar para: Posts [1], Pesquisa e Arquivos [2]


Porque devemos ficar sempre "de perna atrás" com os muçulmanos

25.03.17

no-democracy-we-want-just-islam.jpg

 

[Fazendo uma breve introdução a este tema (e não me esquecendo eu do facto de que as crenças pessoais e religiosas de todos devem sempre ser respeitadas)... O que se passa, é que a religião islâmica não é apenas mais uma religião qualquer (da mesma maneira que também o Fascismo ou o Comunismo não podem ser descritos meramente como mais umas quaisquer ideologias políticas). Sendo antes o Islamismo uma religião na qual é justificável matar e massacrar aqueles que não sejam adeptos da mesma. E sendo os grupos terroristas que se baseiam no Corão (assim como quem celebrou mais um recente atentado terrorista) pessoas que estão meramente a seguir e concordam com alguns dos princípios que são neste livro defendidos (enquanto a maioria dos adeptos desta religião simplesmente escolhe ignorar tais princípios). E, isto, falando apenas de alguns dos mais bárbaros actos defendidos e cometidos pelos adeptos desta religião - que, como muitos saberão, não são os únicos...]

 

 

Study: One Third of Young Muslims in France Think Terrorism is “Acceptable”

Full report delayed until after the election because it’s not “politically correct”

Paul Joseph Watson
PrisonPlanet.com
March 21, 2017

A third of young Muslims in France think that terrorism is “acceptable” a new study has found, with the full report being delayed until after the election because it is not “politically correct”.

Findings of the study, which canvassed the opinions of 6828 high school students after the 2015 Paris attacks, were presented at a press conference in the French capital by researchers Olivier Galland and Anne Muxel.

The results are disturbing but not surprising given attitudes amongst Muslims living in European countries.

– A young Muslim is four times more likely to adhere to radical beliefs than a Christian.

– 33% of Muslim students consider it “acceptable” to “participate in violent actions for his ideas”. In other words, a third are sympathetic towards terrorism.

– 20% of Muslim students agreed with the statement that it was “acceptable to stand up for your religion with weapons”.

– 24% of those surveyed refused to fully condemn the Charlie Hebdo killings.

– 21% of those surveyed refused to fully condemn the Bataclan theater massacre during which 89 people were killed as part of the wider November 13 Paris attack that claimed 130 lives.

It is worth emphasizing that the percentage of young Muslims who refused to condemn Charlie Hebdo and the November 13 massacre are likely to be much higher than the numbers listed above given that those results are representative of the entire sample, and Muslims make up just 25% of the sample.

“When asked if these attitudes could be due to economic and social factors or a sense of victimisation, the researchers responded that “membership in the Muslim religion is the most predictive factor,” notes Westmonster.

The results were “not very politically correct,” remarked French journalist Gurvan Le Guellec, while others at the press conference expressed concern about the timing, noting that the full report would not be released until after the election.

Left-wing newspaper Le Monde slammed the researchers for “opening Pandora’s box” by simply relating the facts of the study.

However, the results are in line with previous polls such as a 2006 Pew Global Attitudes study which found that 42% of Muslims aged 18-29 thought that suicide bombings were sometimes justified.

The study vindicates the concerns of the majority of Europeans who, when asked in a recent Royal Institute of International Affairs survey, said they would like to see a total ban on Muslim immigration.

 

 


(Passagens violentas no Corão: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx)

 

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

Amazon começou a rotular certos livros "Teorias da Conspiração"

17.01.17

Depois da recente (e ainda decorrente) ofensiva contra a imprensa alternativa, sob a forma de uma campanha que visa difamar a última rotulando-a como emissora de "notícias falsas", eis que - no decorrer de umas colocações que fiz no Twitter - quando fui ao sítio da Amazon saber como se soletrava o nome de um autor, me deparei com o seguinte - um acrescento agora feito pela Amazon ao título de um livro.

 

(Cliquem na imagem para a ampliar.)

Screenshot - 17-01-2017 - 05:29:46.png

 

Relativamente ao qual aproveito para fazer uma pergunta retórica, aos média de massas e seus (verdadeiros) amos: Se estes sítios e autores emitem notícias falsas e escrevem livros com meras "teorias da conspiração" - e estão vocês, claramente, incomodados com os mesmos, ao ponto de fazerem uma campanha contra estes - se são nomes de organizações e indivíduos muito específicos os que são mencionados por estes, se há mesmo muita gente a prestar atenção aos últimos e se são graves as acusações que estes fazem, por que razão não tomam vocês a muito mais democrática atitude de processar judicialmente tais responsáveis? (Será que é porque têm medo do resultado de acções desse tipo?)

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

"What's up?!... Money! Money! Money!"

12.09.15

(Alguma alma caridosa, que tenha pena de quem não quer lutar no seu país-natal por melhores condições de vida, talvez queira ir dizer a estes imigrantes que, para além da União Europeia, se estiverem eles dispostos a "ir lavar pratos para a Suíça", podem lá ganhar mesmo muito dinheiro...)

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

Ataques terroristas de Londres, ocorridos a 7 de Julho de 2005, foram também uma série de "atentados de bandeira falsa"

07.07.15

A história ofical destes atentados, que nos conta o governo britânico, é uma <enorme mentira>.
E quem, a mando deste último governo, investiga honestamente o fenómeno do terrorismo no seu país, é simplesmente despedido das suas forças policiais, quando descobre quem é que realmente está por trás deste tipo de ataques.
As provas disto são inúmeras - logo a começar pelo facto de que o "cabecilha" dos supostos terroristas envolvidos nestes ataques é um agente do MI6 e pelo facto de que quem treinou os mesmos foi um informador do governo estadunidense.
E, depois de saber a Verdade sobre as duas outras mais conhecidas séries de atentados terroristas que atingiram solo ocidental - [1] [2] - nada disto deverá ser uma surpresa para ninguém.
Por isso, engulam (uma vez mais) as mentiras dos média de massas sobre este assunto, se quiserem continuar ignorantes e fáceis de enganar, ou comecem antes a informar-se por vós próprios sobre o mesmo, através das várias fontes que eu recomendo, se é saber em que mundo é que realmente vivem o que querem.
Mas, se é apenas de uma "bizarra coincidência" que pensam que se trata o episódio de que no seguinte vídeo se fala (tal como uma outra conhecida, da mesma natureza) e que os nossos governos ocidentais são incapazes de mentir aos seus cidadãos e de lhes fazer uma coisa destas, por favor, deixem o vosso contacto nos comentários a esta colocação - pois, eu tenho uma ponte que vos quero vender...

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

A agenda da redução populacional

06.12.14
"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, to contribute something to solving overpopulation."
--- Príncipe Filipe, duque de Edimburgo

 

(Dito pelo marido de quem lidera esta conspiração da Nova Ordem Mundial, se a afirmação acima citada não vos preocupa, devia...)

Quem duvidar que as elites ocidentais planeiam realmente reduzir a população mundial, no futuro próximo - e em grandes números - pode ver o seguinte bom vídeo, onde o investigador Webster Tarpley cita várias passagens de um livro que foi escrito por um óbvio lacaio destas mesmas elites.



E, a acrescentar ao anterior vídeo, têm <este> muito bom artigo escrito por Paul Joseph Watson, do sítio PrisonPlanet.com, e <este><este> muito importantes artigos, resultantes de uma investigação feita por um outro colaborador do mesmo sítio.

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

colocado por Fernando Negro às 00:24

O cancro como arma política

08.03.13





US Senators Frank Church and John Tower examine
a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) poison dart gun that
causes cancer and heart attacks, during the US Senate Select
Committee’s investigation into the assassination plots
on foreign leaders in 1975.
Cancer the secret weapon?

The heart of the matter


Published: Monday, February 27, 2012

Charles Kong Soo


It was a case destined for the X-Files and conspiracy theorists alike, when Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez speculated that the US might have developed a way to weaponise cancer, after several Latin American leaders were diagnosed with the disease. The list includes former Argentine president, Nestor Kirchner (colon cancer) Brazil’s president Dilma Rousseff (lymphoma cancer), her predecessor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (throat cancer), Chavez (undisclosed), former Cuban president Fidel Castro (stomach cancer) Bolivian president, Evo Morales (nasal cancer) and Paraguayan president Fernando Lugo (lymphoma cancer). What do they have in common besides cancer? All of them are left-wing leaders. Coincidence? In his December 28, 2011 end-of-year address to the Venezuelan military, Chavez hinted that the US might have found a way to give Latin American leaders cancer.

"Would it be so strange that they’ve invented the technology to spread cancer and we won’t know about it for 50 years?" Chavez asked. "It is very hard to explain, even with the law of probabilities, what has been happening to some leaders in Latin America. It’s at the very least strange," he said. Chavez said he received warning from Cuba’s former leader Fidel Castro, who has survived hundreds of unsuccessful assassination attempts. "Fidel always told me, 'Chavez take care. These people have developed technology. You are very careless. Take care what you eat, what they give you to eat ... a little needle and they inject you with I don’t know what'," he said.

Unsolved mysteries

Sounds far-fetched? WikiLeaks reported that in 2008 the American Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) asked its embassy in Paraguay to collect all biometric data, including the DNA of all four presidential candidates. Right here in the Caribbean conspiracy theorists believe that the CIA also had a hand in the deaths of T&T’s own civil rights activist and Pan-Africanist Kwame Ture, Jamaica’s legendary reggae icon Bob Marley and Dominican Prime Minister Rosie Douglas. During the United States Senate Select Committee’s investigation into CIA’s assassination plots on foreign leaders in 1975 it was revealed that the agency had developed a poison dart gun that caused heart attacks and cancer. The gun fired a frozen liquid poison-tipped dart, the width of a human hair and a quarter of an inch long, that could penetrate clothing, was almost undetectable and left no trace in a victim’s body.

Kwame Ture or Stokely Carmichael, the radical former Black Panther leader who inaugurated the Black Power Movement of the 1960s went to his death claiming that the CIA had poisoned him with cancer. Ture died of prostate cancer at the age of 57 in 1998. His friend, multi-media artist and activist Wayne "Rafiki" Morris, said Ture said "without equivocation" that the CIA gave him cancer. "I knew Kwame from 1976 and for all the time I knew him he never drank or smoked cigarettes," Morris said. "He was a very good swimmer and exercised regularly, he didn’t have any medical condition and was very conscious of his health."

If the shoe fit...

Bob Marley died of melanoma cancer in 1981. He was 36-years-old. The official report is he contracted cancer after injuring his toe which never healed while playing football in 1977. The conspiracy theorists allege that Marley was given a pair of boots with a piece of copper wire inside that was coated with a carcinogenic substance that pricked his big toe by Carl Colby, son of the late CIA director William Colby. There is an eerie similarity between Marley and Castro involving poisoned shoes. Cuban ambassador to T&T, Humberto Rivero said the CIA and Cuban exiles tried more than 600 attempts to kill Castro from exploding cigars, injecting him with cancer, to a wet suit lined with poison. In the case of Marley the CIA allegedly used cancer in his shoes, for Castro they placed the highly toxic poison thallium salts in his shoes. After only eight months being elected as Prime Minister of Dominica, radical politician Rosie Douglas was found dead on the floor of his residence in 2000.

The cause of death was listed as a result of a massive heart attack. His heart was twice its normal size. Just like Ture and Marley, he exercised regularly. Douglas’ eldest son, Cabral insisted that his father had been murdered and also hinted at the involvement of the CIA. Moshood Abiola, the man widely believed to have won the 1993 elections in Nigeria, was reported to have died of a heart attack after he was given a cocktail which expanded his heart to twice its size in 1998. Jack Ruby, the assassin who killed US president John Kennedy’s alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald, died from lung cancer in 1967. What was strange was the cancer cells were not the type that originate in the respiratory system. He told his family that he was injected with cancer cells in prison when he was treated with shots for a cold. He died just before he was to testify before Congress.

Lockerbie bomber, Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, developed terminal cancer. The leader of Canada’s left-leaning Opposition party, the New Democratic Party (NDP), Jack Layton died of an undisclosed form of cancer in 2011. It will appear that having leftist tendencies are hazardous to a person’s health. From 1953 the Russians were using microwaves to attack the US embassy staff in Moscow, Russia. One third of the staff eventually died of cancer from this microwave irradiation. Imagine how advanced and sophisticated assassination technology has become today.

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

EUA poderão encenar falso ataque iraniano para justificar guerra

14.01.12

(Para quem tiver seguido este blogue desde o início, o que digo não deverá ser nenhuma novidade. Mas visto terem, entretanto, surgido mais alguns seguidores e porque, de qualquer modo, não quero deixar de mencionar aqui esta hipótese, nesta altura já óbvia para muita gente, aqui vai então este aviso...)

Se um qualquer "ataque" por parte do Irão aos EUA, que ocorra nesta altura certa, que mais convém ao Ocidente, for anunciado pelos média controlados - que, convenientemente, não irão mencionar todo o historial de "ataques de bandeira falsa" feitos pelo governo estadunidense, com o objectivo de providenciar um pretexto para iniciar guerras no passado - podem ter a certeza de que foram os próprios EUA ou Israel quem orquestrou tal ataque.
Os iranianos não são estúpidos e têm feito tudo para evitar este conflito. Não têm nada a ganhar em provocar o Ocidente, que os esmagará numa possível guerra.
O Ocidente, por seu lado, tem grandes interesses em que tal ataque, supostamente iraniano, ocorra, para, desta maneira, camuflar os seus ataques, e possível invasão, como sendo meras respostas e um exercício de autodefesa.
Ao que parece, o início de uma possível guerra poderá estar planeado só para daqui a uns meses, quando o Ocidente esteja preparado para o bloqueio do Estreito de Ormuz. (Será que até que se estabeleça efectiva e temporariamente o oleoduto de Abu Dhabi-Fujairah como um ponto de trânsito, que permitirá evitar que o petróleo oriundo do Golfo Pérsico passe por este estreito?) Mas ainda que sejam tomadas certas medidas e que não haja guerra, mas apenas sanções e consequente bloqueio do estreito, é de esperar que o preço do petróleo suba consideravelmente...
Entretanto, os EUA continuam a colocar tropas perto da fronteira iraniana e a tomar outras medidas de preparação para uma possível guerra.
Quem quiser ir estando a par dos últimos acontecimentos, pode ir consultando os sítios na Internet de Alex Jones, o sítio do Centro de Pesquisa sobre Globalização, o sítio da Press TV iraniana e o sítio da RT, que deverão contextualizar devidamente o que for acontecendo.

Ex-Israeli Intelligence Officer: “Pearl Harbor” Style Attack Will Be Pretext For War On Iran

Jerusalem Post article implies US will stage provocation to justify military assault

Paul Joseph Watson
PrisonPlanet.com
Friday, January 13, 2012

Former Israeli intelligence officer Avi Perry writes that a “surprise” Pearl Harbor-style Iranian attack on an American warship in the Persian Gulf will provide the pretext for the US to launch all-out warfare against Iran.

Given the fact that former Vice President Dick Cheney’s office openly considered staging a false flag attack on a US vessel in the Persian Gulf to blame it on Iran as a pretext for war, Perry’s summation of how “2012 will see to a new war,” cannot be taken lightly.

Under the headline ‘The looming war with Iran’, Perry writes:

Iran, just like Nazi Germany in the 1940s, will take the initiative and “help” the US president and the American public make up their mind by making the first move, by attacking a US aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf.

The Iranian attack on an American military vessel will serve as a justification and a pretext for a retaliatory move by the US military against the Iranian regime. The target would not be Iran’s nuclear facilities. The US would retaliate by attacking Iran’s navy, their military installations, missile silos, airfields. The US would target Iran’s ability to retaliate, to close down the Strait of Hormuz. The US would then follow by targeting the regime itself.

Elimination of Iran’s nuclear facilities? Yes. This part would turn out to be the final act, the grand finale. It might have been the major target, had the US initiated the attack. However, under this “Pearl Harbor” scenario, in which Iran had launched a “surprise” attack on the US navy, the US would have the perfect rationalization to finish them off, to put an end to this ugly game.

Perry’s use of quotation marks around the word “surprise” comes across as a literary device to imply that the so-called “surprise” attack will not be a surprise at all.


Of course, the Pearl Harbor attack, which provided the pretext for America’s formal entry into World War Two, was not a “surprise” by any means, it was known well ahead of time.

Released Freedom of Information Act files prove that weeks before the December 7 attack by the Japanese, the United States Navy had intercepted eighty-three messages from Admiral Yamamoto which gave them details of precisely when and where the attack would take place.

It’s also completely nonsensical that Iran would actively seek to provide the world’s pre-eminent nuclear superpower with an easy excuse to justify an attack by deliberately targeting US warships in the Persian Gulf. Perry’s article seems to be a tongue-in-cheek admission that the US or Israel will manufacture such an attack.

This presumption need not delve into the murky realm of conspiracy theories – history tells us that fake naval attacks have been staged on numerous occasions to hoodwink the American people into supporting wars of aggression.

Remember the Maine? The battleship USS Maine blew up while it was stationed in Havana harbor in February 1898. Although a Navy investigation could not find the cause of the explosion, the American media, led by pioneer of “yellow journalism” William Randolph Hearst, immediately blamed Spanish saboteurs, whipping the public into a war fever.

When Hearst sent his reporter Frederick Remington to investigate, little of note could be established about the disaster. When Remington asked to be recalled, Hearst told him, “Please remain. You furnish the pictures, I’ll furnish the war.”

“Hundreds of editorials demanded that the Maine and American honor be avenged. Many Americans agreed. Soon a rallying cry could be heard everywhere — in the papers, on the streets, and in the halls of Congress: “Remember the Maine! To hell with Spain.”

As a result of an incident that many consider to either be an accident or a deliberate false flag attack by the US on its own ship, the US was at war with Spain within months.

Over 60 years later, another staged naval event, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, was used as a pretext for the United States to launch the Vietnam war.

President Johnson told the American public that North Vietnamese torpedo boats launched an “unprovoked attack” against a U.S. destroyer on “routine patrol” in the Tonkin Gulf. Leaked cables and recordings of White House telephone conversations later proved that the incident was completely manufactured, and that “our destroyers were just shooting at phantom targets — there were no PT boats there,” according to Navy squadron commander James Stockdale, who was flying over the scene that night.

There was almost a 21st century version mirror of the Gulf of Tonkin incident in January 2008, when the US government announced that it had been “moments” away from opening fire on a group of Iranian patrol boats in the Strait of Hormuz after the boats allegedly broadcast a warning that they were about to attack a US vessel.

The Iranian warning later turned out to be of dubious origin, but the incident led to a discussion in Vice-President Dick Cheney’s office about how to start a war with Iran by launching a false flag attack at sea, according to Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh.

The January 2008 Strait of Hormuz incident taught Cheney and other administration insiders that, “If you get the right incident, the American public will support it”. Hersh said: “There were a dozen ideas proffered about how to trigger a war. The one that interested me the most was why don’t we build, we in ‘our shipyard’, – build four or five boats that look like Iranian PT boats. Put Navy seals on them with a lot of arms. And next time one of our boats goes to the Straits of Hormuz, start a shoot-up. Might cost some lives”.

Given the dangerous nature of overlapping Iranian and US/Israeli naval drills set to take place in the same region at some point within the next two weeks, the potential for another staged incident at sea that will be exploited as a pretext for war remains a potent threat.

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for PrisonPlanet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.

 

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

colocado por Fernando Negro às 14:59