Saltar para: Posts , Pesquisa e Arquivos 
(O vídeo acima colocado foi tirado desta reportagem.)
[Para quem duvidar do que eu já aqui denunciava, de que este fenómeno de imigração massiva de pessoas de culturas não europeias (i.e. africanas e asiáticas) para dentro da Europa é algo que muito interessa ao poder estabelecido ocidental, aqui fica a seguinte denúncia, por parte das autoridades italianas e europeia. À qual aproveito para acrescentar que: o termo "Fortaleza Europa", que é por vezes referido por alguma da suposta esquerda, não passa de um mito (muito provavelmente promovido por forças políticas controladas, com vista a promover uma ainda maior imigração) - pois, basta a qualquer pessoa visitar as várias metrópoles dos vários países europeus ocidentais, para constatar que já uma boa percentagem da população que nelas vive é de origem não europeia.]
‘Undesirable NGOs’ Fund ISIS-linked Refugee Boats to EU
By F. William Engdahl | 5 April 2017
Investigations by Italian authorities and others have found that NGOs funded by among others George Soros, are actively financing private ships to smuggle tens of thousands of illegal North African refugees into the EU via Southern Italy. The human trafficking is reportedly linked to ISIS smuggling networks. If confirmed by authorities, it could potentially open the NGOs to criminal charges.
Carmelo Zuccaro, the Chief Prosecutor of Catania, Sicily, has testified to a committee of the Italian Parliament in March that an official investigation into the funding of a fleet of modern refugee boats in the Mediterranean by private NGOs is warranted. He cited evidence that the human traffic smugglers in Libya and other North African coastal states, often reportedly linked to ISIS or other criminal bands, were coordinating the traffic into Italy of tens of thousands of illegal refugees. Zuccaro reported evidence that the human traffickers either on land, or on board smaller migrant boats, call the larger NGO-financed rescue vessels directly to arrange transfer of refugees. That implies a very close level of coordination between the human smuggler bands and the NGO-funded fleet of ships.
Zuccaro announced that his office is investigating what he called the “abnormal” amount of funds that allows even small agencies to hire ships. Italian authorities have so far uncovered at least ten private Non-Governmental Organizations involved, among them several NGOs financed by US hedge fund speculator George Soros’ Open Society Foundations.
Zuccaro also told Italian press that, “the facilitation of illegal immigration is a punishable offense regardless of the intention.” He said that Italy was also investigating Islamic radicalization occurring in prisons and camps where immigrants are hired, illegally or off the books. European Immigration Commissioner Dimitris Avramopoulos stated that some 80% of the North African migrants arriving in Italy had no legal right to asylum. Many were reportedly from criminal gangs that sprang up after the 2011 US-backed bombing of Libya and killing of Gaddafi that threw the country into anarchy.
Over the course of the past year as the refugee human trafficking route through Greece has been all but closed down, the route into the EU from North Africa has shifted to southern Italy and to use of modern chartered vessels to carry the thousands of refugees to Sicily and other parts of Southern Italy. In the first two months of 2017 illegal refugee inflows from Libya into southern Italy have risen by as much as 40% over the same period a year earlier.
NGO Human Trafficking
The official EU European Border and Coast Guard Agency, FRONTEX, in its 2017 Risk Analysis report, states that “the Central Mediterranean has become the main route for African migrants to the EU and it is very likely to remain so for the foreseeable future. Specifically, 89% of migrants arrived from Libya.”
The FRONTEX report went on to note a dramatic shift in 2016 from 2015. Earlier the major migration flow went from Turkey into Greece and the Balkan states on to Germany and other EU states: “NGO rescue operations (into southern Italy-w.e.) rose significantly to more than 40% of all incidents. Since June 2016, a significant number of boats were intercepted or rescued by NGO vessels without any prior distress call and without official information as to the rescue location.”
Frontex raised the possibility that traffickers were putting migrants out to sea in a prearranged collusion with the private NGO ships that recover them and then bring them to Italy “like taxis.” What the EU agency described is a human smuggling operation, in effect, operations of international criminal organizations including ISIS, being run by ships chartered or owned by various Non-Governmental Organizations among them Soros-financed NGOs.
Italian admiral Enrico Credendino, commander of the EU’s anti-trafficking Operation Sophia, said the NGOs’ ships come close to the Libyan shore to attract migrant boats in the dark. “At night they use large floodlights; the traffickers see them and send the dinghies (carrying migrants) towards the lights,” he stated. Then they are taken aboard the larger NGO ships for the journey to Italy.
Soros NGOs working with ISIS?
If the Italian investigations into the NGO funding of the fleet of charter ships are confirmed, this would suggest that the NGOs, several of them linked to foundations or organizations financied or controlled by George Soros, are colluding illegally with human trafficker bands, in many cases bands controlled by ISIS in Libya.
A 2017 report by Quilliam, a private UK think-tank, claims that ISIS or the Islamic State (IS) is involved in the human trafficking operations into Italy. Their report states: “While some refugees may have to pay smugglers up to $560 for passage towards the Mediterranean coast, IS, capitalising on this route, offer free passage to those willing to join IS…To those reaching the Mediterranean coast, IS offer potential recruits up to $1,000 to join the organisation. ” Not exactly humanitarian.
US human rights investigator and lawyer William Craddick has discovered that several of the NGOs chartering the human smuggling boats ware linked to financial patronage of George Soros
and his Open Society Foundations including avaaz.org of the Soros-funded Moveon.org; Save the Children, and Médicins Sans Frontiéres (MSF) which charters a Mediterranean ship called Aquarius.
International Migration Initiative
Soros’ Open Society Foundations, which also has been reported to receive money from the US Government through the CIA-linked USAID, also funds something it calls the International Migration Initiative, an NGO Soros’ Open Society Foundations set up in 2010. Clearly the idea behind creation of Soros’ IMI was done with an eye to what would soon unfold in Europe as well as the USA refugee crises. The website of the Soros International Migration Initiative openly states that it has a “strategic corridor approach, facilitating coordinated action in countries of origin, transit, and destination.” The same website identifies what it terms three strategic migration corridors: Asia/Middle East, Central America/Mexico, and Eurasia, which centers on Central Asia into Russia. That almost sounds like a geopolitical grand design of someone.
In September 2016 the same George Soros announced he was “donating” $500 million to the European and US refugee cause. He declined to say where and how the money would be used. Was part of that earmarked for financing the fleet of modern NGO ships that bring tens of thousands of refugees from Libya? A relevant question to be sure for the Italian and other investigations.
In August, 2016 DCLeaks, a US website similar to Wikileaks, released 2,576 files predominately related to George Soros’ Open Society Foundations. One memo by the Soros foundation dated May 10, 2016, argued that Europe’s refugee crisis should be accepted as a “new normal,” and that the crisis means, “new opportunities” for Soros’ foundations to influence immigration policies on a global scale.
Soros and the ‘Merkel Plan’
The pawprints of Soros’ foundations are all over the EU refugee crisis that is upending social and economic stability across Europe since August 2015 when German Chancellor Angela Merkel surprised many even in her own party by declaring in a comment since become infamous, “we can do it,” followed by her decision on September 5, 2015 to accept thousands of refugees who had set out to walk from Keleti Station in Budapest to Germany, announcing that all refugees were welcome with open arms, no questions asked, no limit set. More than one million refugees, not only from Syria, flooded into Germany and other EU countries. As domestic opposition mounted against Merkel, in late 2015 Merkel went on a popular German TV talk show where she announced, “I have a plan.”
Indeed she did. It was even named by its architects, “The Merkel Plan.”
The plan was drawn up by a think tank with offices in Berlin, Brussels and Istanbul by the name The European Stability Initiative (ESI). Under that Merkel Plan, in addition to the over 1 million refugees of 2015, in 2016 Germany should, “agree to grant asylum to 500,000 Syrian refugees registered in Turkey over the coming 12 months.”
The Merkel Plan for accepting hundreds of thousands of refugees without question into Germany and other EU states with no number limit, “the new normal,” the term used by Soros’ International Migration Initiative website, was a product of the Soros networks as well. The author of the Merkel Plan and head of the ESI is an Austrian sociologist, Gerald Knaus. Knaus is a member of the George Soros-financed European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), and an Soros’ Open Society Fellow. Knaus’ European Stability Initiative was financed, according to the German Die Zeit, by among others the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Washington-based German Marshall Fund, as well as Soros’ Open Society Foundations.
Rome on brink of War
The recent explosion of illegal refugees into Southern Italy, aided by a fleet of ships chartered by NGOs linked to Soros and others, is no innocent humanitarian good samaritan deed. In December 2016 Virginia Raggi, the Mayor of Rome, said that the city was on the verge of a “war” between migrants and poor Italians. In southern Italy, the Sicilian Cosa Nostra had declared a “war on migrants” in 2016 amid reports that the Italian mafia had begun fighting with North African crime gangs who entered the EU among migrant populations.
The allegations of Soros NGO financing of a fleet of boats to illegally smuggle refugees or other migrants from North Africa into the EU suggested at the very least that the Washington-tied Soros networks were doing more than charity. It suggested that his NGOs were at least indirectly complicit in projects that were destroying the social stability of the EU much as Soros’ NGOs did in Ukraine in 2014 and before.
The impression is difficult to avoid that the entire current mass refugee phenomenon, together with the NATO wars that trigger them in places like Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, is part of a far larger and far more sinister design and that the money of George Soros, the character behind virtually every US State Department and CIA-backed Color Revolution since the 2000 toppling of Slobodan Milosevic in Belgrade, is right in the middle of it.
Little wonder that the foundations and operations of “philanthropist” Soros are increasingly under attack around the world, including in Viktor Orban’s Hungary, Soros’ country of birth.
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”
Activista originário da subcultura holígane inglesa, constantemente caluniado e demonizado por alguma da suposta esquerda, censurado pela imprensa controlada e alvo de peças de ataque por parte da mesma, constantemente assediado pelas autoridades do seu país, repetida e também seriamente atacado fisicamente pelas suas críticas ao Islamismo radical e alguém que, ainda assim, simplesmente não se deixa calar, constitui este muito inteligente cidadão britânico (passando ao lado das críticas que se podem fazer ao mesmo) um interessante caso (proeminente) das ainda muito poucas pessoas no Reino Unido que têm a coragem de denunciar os problemas associados à religião islâmica, sem receio de ser erradamente colado a posições racistas ou xenófobas.
Quase todos os vídeos que podem ser encontrados no YouTube que o têm como protagonista são interessantes de se ver, para ter uma pessoa consciência de um muito sério problema que poderá um dia afectar outros países europeus mais a Sul. Sendo os que a seguir coloco, apenas dois que escolhi como amostra.
[Fazendo uma breve introdução a este tema (e não me esquecendo eu do facto de que as crenças pessoais e religiosas de todos devem sempre ser respeitadas)... O que se passa, é que a religião islâmica não é apenas mais uma religião qualquer (da mesma maneira que também o Fascismo ou o Comunismo não podem ser descritos meramente como mais umas quaisquer ideologias políticas). Sendo antes o Islamismo uma religião na qual é justificável matar e massacrar aqueles que não sejam adeptos da mesma. E sendo os grupos terroristas que se baseiam no Corão (assim como quem celebrou mais um recente atentado terrorista) pessoas que estão meramente a seguir e concordam com alguns dos princípios que são neste livro defendidos (enquanto a maioria dos adeptos desta religião simplesmente escolhe ignorar tais princípios). E, isto, falando apenas de alguns dos mais bárbaros actos defendidos e cometidos pelos adeptos desta religião - que, como muitos saberão, não são os únicos...]
Study: One Third of Young Muslims in France Think Terrorism is “Acceptable”
Full report delayed until after the election because it’s not “politically correct”
Paul Joseph Watson
March 21, 2017
A third of young Muslims in France think that terrorism is “acceptable” a new study has found, with the full report being delayed until after the election because it is not “politically correct”.
Findings of the study, which canvassed the opinions of 6828 high school students after the 2015 Paris attacks, were presented at a press conference in the French capital by researchers Olivier Galland and Anne Muxel.
The results are disturbing but not surprising given attitudes amongst Muslims living in European countries.
– A young Muslim is four times more likely to adhere to radical beliefs than a Christian.
– 33% of Muslim students consider it “acceptable” to “participate in violent actions for his ideas”. In other words, a third are sympathetic towards terrorism.
– 20% of Muslim students agreed with the statement that it was “acceptable to stand up for your religion with weapons”.
– 24% of those surveyed refused to fully condemn the Charlie Hebdo killings.
– 21% of those surveyed refused to fully condemn the Bataclan theater massacre during which 89 people were killed as part of the wider November 13 Paris attack that claimed 130 lives.
It is worth emphasizing that the percentage of young Muslims who refused to condemn Charlie Hebdo and the November 13 massacre are likely to be much higher than the numbers listed above given that those results are representative of the entire sample, and Muslims make up just 25% of the sample.
“When asked if these attitudes could be due to economic and social factors or a sense of victimisation, the researchers responded that “membership in the Muslim religion is the most predictive factor,” notes Westmonster.
The results were “not very politically correct,” remarked French journalist Gurvan Le Guellec, while others at the press conference expressed concern about the timing, noting that the full report would not be released until after the election.
Left-wing newspaper Le Monde slammed the researchers for “opening Pandora’s box” by simply relating the facts of the study.
However, the results are in line with previous polls such as a 2006 Pew Global Attitudes study which found that 42% of Muslims aged 18-29 thought that suicide bombings were sometimes justified.
The study vindicates the concerns of the majority of Europeans who, when asked in a recent Royal Institute of International Affairs survey, said they would like to see a total ban on Muslim immigration.
(Passagens violentas no Corão: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx)
(Alguma alma caridosa, que tenha pena de quem não quer lutar no seu país-natal por melhores condições de vida, talvez queira ir dizer a estes imigrantes que, para além da União Europeia, se estiverem eles dispostos a "ir lavar pratos para a Suíça", podem lá ganhar mesmo muito dinheiro...)
É óbvio que, também para que celebrações de vitórias contra o Estado Islâmico (como a acima retratada) não se tornem um fenómeno comum na Síria, é do interesse do Ocidente estimular esta onda de refugiados (na sua grande maioria sírios) em tão grande número. E, deixei nos comentários a <esta> colocação, feita no blogue do meu amigo Dr. Octopus, uma explicação mais elaborada sobre isto - de onde tiro a seguinte citação de um artigo sobre a luta das mulheres curdas da minoria iazidi:
"the women are conscious of a 'white' or bloodless genocide, as EU governments — especially Germany — try to lure Yazidi women abroad, uprooting them from their sacred homes and instrumentalizing them for their own agendas."
Tragédias à parte, é importante reflectirmos sobre as causas de todo este fenómeno de imigração massiva para a Europa (para além do facto de ter o mesmo origem em guerras criadas ou instigadas pelo próprio Ocidente). Nomeadamente, questionando-nos sobre porque razão não decidem antes estas pessoas lutar pela libertação das suas pátrias e como conseguem elas, numa situação de desemprego, arranjar tanto dinheiro para pagar a traficantes de seres humanos - ainda mais, quando são oriundas de países (muito) pobres.
E, quanto à reacção do poder estabelecido europeu a este fenómeno, é também importante fazer algumas perguntas.
Alterando significativamente as populações humanas e as culturas dos diferentes estados europeus, para uma situação em que comecem estes, outrora diferentes, a assemelhar-se uns aos outros (por terem acolhido o mesmo tipo de populações estrangeiras), é mais uma facilidade que se cria para a pretendida extinção dos diferentes estados-nação europeus e sua substituição por um, cada vez mais homogéneo, superestado europeu.