Saltar para: Posts [1], Pesquisa e Arquivos [2]

CNN apanhada (outra vez) a encenar uma notícia falsa


Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)




[Para além de aproveitar eu para chamar a atenção para dois "tweets" - [1] [2] - recentemente feitos pelo ex-agente dos serviços secretos russos, Daniel Estulin, no qual denunciou (/confirmou) ele o controlo oculto que existe destas novas moedas electrónicas, deixo aqui o que, também eu, tive recentemente a dizer, especificamente sobre o fenómeno da conhecida moeda "Bitcoin", num fórum de discussão sobre assuntos relacionados com o Software Livre.]
Re: Why try to push bitcoin so hard
Post by Fernando Negro » 2017-02-28 05:30

Bitcoin is almost certainly a product of the "powers-that-be" - who, among other things, want to ultimately surveil and control everything and everyone.

Being that the (obvious) reason why it has been so quickly adopted by the main corporations, and is so much promoted in the mainstream media, and through armies of (what are certainly) establishment "trolls" (who, yes, do exist: ... gency.html).

The key term here, is "Cashless Society Control Grid".

And, notice how Western governments have already started restricting the use of physical cash ( ... try-guide/), and how the mainstream media have already started calling for its abolishment ( ... -cash.html).

Since that quoting is practised in these forums, and also to make my life much easier, I'll just quote, in here, what I've said in the recent past about this "Bitcoin" phenomenon:

(taken from here: ... ment-28176)

Bitcoin” is almost certainly a creation of the powers-that-be…

(And, also a too much sophisticated piece of networking software to have been done by a single person… Where did this “Sakamoto” character made his beta tests, then? His home network?)

The way that the Internet is immensely surveilled, nowadays (don’t look too much for information concerning the P*OMIS software – ... romis.html – or something bad – ... index.html – might happen to you), there’s no way that such a complex piece of software, that operates over the Internet, could have been developed without the powers-that-be already knowing, by now, who has created it.

So, this new piece of news [] will surely turn out to be just more “smoke”, to hide the true origins of this phenomenon.

Look at how quickly some of the big corporations (who constitute the real powers-that-be) adopted this currency ( ... coins.html). If this was really something contrary to the interests of the establishment, they would never adopt it – let alone so quickly, and in a way that promotes its growth.

And, all this paranoia about Bitcoin being used for crimes, is just (like you’ve said) that – paranoia. That is going to be used as a pretext to increase the surveillance and control of the Internet.

This “Bitcoin” phenomenon is the concretization of what Alex Jones and others have been warning, for almost two decades now… The so-called “Cashless Society Control Grid”.

And, explaining what I mean by this…

1) First of all, this so-called “cryptocurrency” is not cryptographic, at all. Since that, the NSA and the likes (who created its hash algorithm) can already decrypt it (

2) Second, it’s the end of privacy in monetary transactions. Since that, every transaction is publicly recorded. And, all that it takes to identify which transaction corresponds to which deal, is to read the corresponding e-mail exchanges between the persons involved in such a deal. (Do you think that your, however possibly encrypted, e-mails are not being read also? Check again the same link I’ve posted above:

3) Third, you are almost totally dependent on an Internet connection to be able to make such transactions. And, who controls the Internet? Big Brother. That is: the main/big corporations, that constitute the real powers-that-be, and their puppet-governments.

The future that the powers-that-be have planned, will be a Police State where *everything* – including the Internet – will be controlled. And, the future will also obviously be one where artificial intelligence will be advanced enough to be able to inspect every Internet traffic, and intercept/block whichever type it (specifically) wants. Here’s an example of how this is already being done, in certain places, since the last decade: ... #msg525995 [And, here's the description of the method used:]

Do you know what “WWW” stands for, in intelligence circles? R: “World Wide Wiretap”.

So, if you’re an individual who’s fighting the powers-that-be, either (1) because of an oppressive government, that passes laws where it forbids certain people to use the Internet (what’s already being done in certain countries, is to require an ID to use this network), or (2) because the big Internet companies that dominate the market (and that you are forced to use) simply decide that they don’t want to let you use their services anymore, you are always dependent on the “good will” of other entities to be able to make monetary transactions.

And all this, not counting with all the “dirty tricks” that can be used against you – like simply interfering with your monetary transactions, when they’re passing through the Big Brother network, and then have your Internet company respond to you that it must have been some “glitch”, or that they simply don’t know where your money went. (Here’s an example, if you want, of one of the big Internet companies making comments of mine disappear, simply because they want to: ... -meus.html)

Also, in the era of spyware and software insecurity, in a lot of proprietary computer operating systems and programs, that most people use (and, where we even have to be careful with the hardware that we use – ... -pc-access), to have a “digital wallet”, on a computer hard drive, is the most ridiculously and laughably insecure manner of storing your money that I have ever heard of! (And, all that it takes to make you loose all your savings, is to simply demagnetize your hard drive – which can be done from a distance.)

Please, (seriously) inform yourselves about Internet and computer security, in order to realize what (/the trap that) you’re really getting yourselves into.

And, I'll leave here two more quotes, from following comments that I made in the same thread:

Concerning Internet “security”: ... _pt1.shtml ... puter.html ... n-the-net/


In order to create and conceive something like “Bitcoin”, there has to be a deep knowledge of computer networking software, and also of Economics – and, I immensely doubt that there’s a single person on this planet that could have both.

(When was the last time that you’ve met a computer “geek” that also had a degree in Economics?)

Therefore, I would much more easily believe this to be the work of a large group of highly intelligent and knowledgeable people, from different areas.

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

colocado por Fernando Negro às 07:08

Google irá rotular a imprensa alternativa como não credível




Não é que a manipulação (verdadeiramente dita) de resultados não seja algo já praticado por este motor de busca. Pois, quem tiver por hábito procurar informar-se sobre factos que são reportados pela imprensa alternativa, já deverá ter observado que os primeiros resultados são por norma, cada vez mais, de sítios cuja credibilidade é verdadeiramente questionável.
Ou seja, cada vez mais, o que acontece é que, se vai uma pessoa usar este motor de busca para se informar sobre factos reportados pela imprensa alternativa, a não ser que use a opção "site:x" (para, deste modo, ter como alvo sítios que já saiba serem credíveis), os resultados que são mais exibidos (isto é, os que aparecem nas primeiras páginas de resultados) são os de sítios na Internet que, até pelo nome dos mesmos, dá para ver que não são credíveis - ou que são até mesmo ridículos - ficando, consequentemente, um ignorante nestes assuntos, que vá pela primeira vez tentar averiguar algum facto não reportado pelos média de massas, com a ideia de que quem anda a escrever (mais extensivamente) sobre aquele assunto estranho de que ouviu falar são mas é uma cambada de "teóricos da conspiração".
(Sendo que, embora não admitindo esta companhia que o tem vindo já a fazer, temos <aqui> a mesma a admitir recentemente que vai começar a fazê-lo.)
Assim como, quem use frequentemente este motor de busca em localidades/computadores diferentes, já poderá ter reparado que, não só as sugestões que aparecerem são dependentes do que andou a pessoa anteriormente a pesquisar sobre, como os próprios resultados são diferentes, consoante o endereço IP que está a ser usado (e têm também <aqui> uma admissão de que é isso mesmo que acontece). Sendo esta a razão pela qual, quando queremos alertar alguém sobre algo, convém sempre providenciar hiperligações específicas - e não apenas dizer a tal pessoa que use certos termos de pesquisa neste conhecido motor de busca.
Mas, se este tipo de manipulação (por parte de um motor de busca com ligações à CIA e à NSA) não parece ser suficiente para manter as pessoas desinformadas - escondendo delas as hiperligações mais relevantes - eis que - no decorrer do pânico que se está a instalar entre o poder estabelecido, causado pela crescente quantidade de pessoas que tem vindo a prestar mais atenção à imprensa alternativa (e da subsequente campanha de difamação desta última imprensa, apelidando-a de emissora de "notícias falsas") - tivemos uma nova evolução...
A rotulação, pura e dura, de sítios de notícias na Internet, que tenta dizer que alguns dos sítios que são alvo desta rotulação não são de confiança(!) (semelhante ao que já começa a ser feito pela Amazon com certos livros mais incómodos).
E, têm <aqui> um artigo que explica o que irá, no futuro próximo, começar a observar-se neste muito conhecido motor de busca.

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

colocado por Fernando Negro às 22:39

Quase 60 estudos científicos "revistos por pares", publicados este ano, demonstraram que não há aquecimento global antropogénico


‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth, Say 58 Scientific Papers in 2017

[Breitbart] by James Delingpole - 6 Jun 2017

“Global warming” is a myth — so say 80 graphs from 58 peer-reviewed scientific papers published in 2017.

In other words, the so-called “Consensus” on global warming is a massive lie. And Donald Trump was quite right to quit the Paris agreement which pretended that the massive lie was true.

By “global warming” these papers don’t, of course, mean the mild warming of around 0.8 degrees Celsius that the planet has experienced since the middle of the 19th century as the world crawled out of the Little Ice Age. Pretty much everyone, alarmists and skeptics alike, is agreed on that.

Rather, they mean “global warming” in the sense that is most commonly used today by grant-troughing scientists, and huxter politicians, and scaremongering green activists, and brainwashed mainstream media (MSM) environmental correspondents. “Global warming” as in the scary, historically unprecedented, primarily man-made phenomenon which we must address urgently before the icecaps melt and the Pacific islands disappear beneath the waves and all the baby polar bears drown.

What all these papers argue in their different ways is that the alarmist version of global warming — aka Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) — is a fake artefact.

That is, all these different experts from around the world — China, Russia, Canada, the U.S., Italy, etc. — have been looking closely at different aspects of the global warming puzzle in various regions and on different timescales and come to the conclusion in irreproachable, peer-reviewed scientific ways that there is no evidence to support the global warming scare story.

Late 20th century and early 21st century global warming, they show, is neither dramatic, nor unusual, nor scary.

Here, as collated by Kenneth Richard at No Tricks Zone, are just some of the charts to prove it.

Büntgen et al, below, shows that temperatures in the northern hemisphere were warmer in the early 1400s than they are today.


Abrantes et al (below) confirms the traditional view — which Michael Mann tried to dismiss with his discredited Hockey Stick chart — that the Medieval Warming Period was warmer than anything we have experienced in our own era.


Here’s one from Li et al showing that China was much warmer 8,000 years ago:


Here’s an unusual one from Guillet et al suggesting that there’s nothing new about wildly early or late grape harvests through the centuries:


And on and on it goes — there are 80 graphs in all, each showing in its different way why the scare about global warming has been horribly overdone because the evidence just doesn’t support its being unusual or a problem. Several of the papers note that the primary influence on warming appears to be solar activity. Few, if any, entertain the notion that carbon dioxide levels have much to do with it.

The intellectually corrupt and mendacious alarmist science establishment — I’m thinking, for example, of my personal bete noir, the left-wing political activist and Nobel-prizewinning geneticist Sir Paul Nurse, former president of the Royal Society — would have us believe that climate skepticism is a minority activity, the preserve of a few cranks, championed only by people who don’t do the science. But this is just ugly propaganda.

Here are dozens of reputable scientists from around the world with no axe to grind collaborating on studies which all corroborate, independently and rigorously, the increasingly respectable view that “man-made global warming” just isn’t a thing.

Not that it ever was a thing, really. This debate — as I argue at some length in Watermelons — was always about left-wing ideology, quasi-religious hysteria, and “follow the money” corruption, never about “science.”

Still, it’s always a comfort to know that “the science” is on our side too.

They do so hate that fact, the Greenies.

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

colocado por Fernando Negro às 23:27

Estou (mais ou menos) no Twitter



Por norma, não uso eu (o que chamo de) serviços e redes "controlados", devido aos repetidos actos de censura de que fui alvo, no passado.
Contudo (e visto que - apesar de tal também acontecer aos muito poucos autores que neste serviço Twitter vou seguindo - [1] [2] [3] [4] - não deixam tais autores de usar tal rede controlada) vejo-me forçado a usar uma conta nesta mesma rede para estar a par do que dizem, de interessante, algumas poucas pessoas...
E, visto que o que dizem estas é, não só interessante, como por vezes importante - dado o que também eu sei sobre alguns dos assuntos que são mencionados e que penso que é, por vezes, importante acrescentar - não consigo resistir a, por vezes, fazer algumas colocações próprias nesta rede, em resposta às que foram feitas por estas pessoas que sigo.
E, assim sendo, venho só dizer-vos que, se quiserem estar a par do que, nestas circunstâncias, vou eu por vezes dizendo nesta rede controlada, podem espreitar, de vez em quando, a minha conta na mesma - mais propriamente, a secção de "Tweets e respostas".

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

Alegado bombista de Manchester é filho de um membro de grupo apoiado (apenas no passado?) pelos serviços secretos britânicos




(O grupo em causa, pertencente à al-Qaeda, é o cuja história é descrita <nesta> página da Wikipedia. E, no final desta colocação que estou a fazer, têm uma palestra do abaixo referido ex-espião do MI5, David Shayler, a contar o que sabia sobre este apoio.)


Blowback? Manchester bomber linked to terrorist group which UK allegedly backed

[RT] Published time: 25 May, 2017 12:24

Manchester suicide bomber Salman Abedi and his father, Ramadan, had long-standing links to a violent jihadist group which may have had British backing for the 2011 Libyan war and a 1996 attempt to kill then-Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.

The controversy centers on the role of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which was both an anti-Gaddafi and Al-Qaeda subsidiary in the North African state.

Many of the fighters which formed the group in the mid-90s were veterans of the Afghan-Soviet war from the 1980s. They went on to fight the Gaddafi regime in Libya itself.

The war saw the overthrow of the Gaddafi regime and the eventual murder of the leader himself after he was captured by opposition fighters. Since NATO’s intervention, Libya has been in chaos.

It has descended into a protracted civil war, is a major contributor to the international refugee crisis, has its own branch of Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL), and two opposing governments.

The elder Abedi was reportedly one of the LIFG fighters who fled Gaddafi’s response to the rebels, settling in London and, later, in Manchester.

The area of Manchester in which Salman Abedi grew up was home to a number of other LIFG members, including former senior commanders including Abd al-Baset Azzouz, who left Manchester to go to Libya and run a 200-300-strong militant network for Osama Bin Laden’s successor, Ayman al-Zawahiri. Azzouz is reported to be an expert bomb-maker.

In 2002, former MI[5] agent and whistleblower David Shayler accused the British spy agency of colluding with the jihadist group in a failed 1996 effort to kill Gaddafi, an allegation the British government strenuously denies.

Allegations have also emerged that in 2011, the UK may have relaxed restrictions on LIFG fighters based in the UK and helped them return to Libya to fight Gaddafi.

The UK was at that time engaged in fighting Gaddafi as part of a US-led NATO coalition. Former fighters interviewed by the Middle East Eye said that the UK actively supported the return of anti-Gaddafi dissidents, including those with Al-Qaeda links, to the North African state.

One fighter who spoke to the Middle East Eye said he had been interviewed by an MI5 agent who asked if he was “willing to go into battle?”

“While I took time to find an answer he turned and told me the British government have no problem with people fighting against Gaddafi,” the fighter said.

Others reported that when the war in Libya began, they looked into how to get fake documents, because their passports had been removed as part of restrictive control orders placed on them by the UK government.

One said that within days, the authorities had returned their passports, after which they headed straight to Libya to take on Gaddafi.

At the time of the war, current UK Prime Minister Theresa May was Home Secretary, with oversight of MI5 operations. It is not clear if she was aware of the decision to relax restrictions of jihadists and return their travel documents.




Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

Daniel Estulin poderá (/deverá) ter mesmo razão, quando fala de uma "guerra interna" que estalou entre as elites da NOM


(Para quem o que é dito <nesta> entrevista recente possa causar muitas dúvidas, deixo aqui o seguinte artigo, publicado uma semana antes do referendo do Brexit - onde é exposta a quantidade de notícias que, na imprensa britânica, foram emitidas contra e a favor desta saída da UE...)



"Hard Evidence: analysis shows extent of press bias towards Brexit"

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

colocado por Fernando Negro às 14:27

Estado Livre de Jones



Um (mesmo) muito bom filme, que tem andado a passar nos canais de cinema TVCine (que estão disponíveis na televisão por cabo), relativamente ao qual deixo apenas um cartaz, por serem os seus trechos de promoção de vídeo demasiado reveladores.
O filme é baseado num episódio verídico que ocorreu durante a Guerra Civil Americana. Sendo que, o seu grande interesse - e também o que faz deste um episódio de grande importância - é o facto de ser uma muito boa demonstração prática de uma das razões de ser da Segunda Emenda à Constituição dos Estados Unidos da América, ímpar entre as várias Constituições existentes no Mundo, que permite aos cidadãos deste país se defenderem do próprio governo, quando este se torne tirânico.

(Um filme também bem realizado, com uma bela fotografia, protagonizado por bons actores e com tudo mais que se pode esperar de uma grande produção de Hollywood...)

Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

colocado por Fernando Negro às 18:20

Descubra o número oculto...



Autoria e outros dados (tags, etc)

colocado por Fernando Negro às 14:50